Jump to content

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Mitt Romney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mitt Romney

[edit]

This nomination predates the introduction in April 2014 of article-specific subpages for nominations and has been created from the edit history of Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests.

This is the archived discussion of the TFAR nomination for the article below. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests). Please do not modify this page.

The result was: scheduled for Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 12, 2014 by BencherliteTalk 13:05, 7 March 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Mitt Romney in 2013

Mitt Romney (born 1947) is an American businessman who was Governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007 and the Republican nominee for President of the United States in the 2012 election. He was raised in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, by his parents Lenore and George Romney, and spent two years in France as a Mormon missionary. He married Ann Davies in 1969, with whom he has had five children. After studying at Brigham Young and Harvard universities, he joined the management consultancy Bain & Company before co-founding the spin-off investment firm Bain Capital. He unsuccessfully ran as the Republican candidate in the 1994 Massachusetts election for Senate against Ted Kennedy. He relaunched his political career after successfully running the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the 2002 Winter Olympics. Elected Governor of Massachusetts in 2002, he helped enact state health care reform legislation, the first of its kind in America. Romney won the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, becoming the first Mormon to be a major party presidential nominee, but lost the election to Barack Obama by a 332–206 electoral college margin and by 51–47 percent in the popular vote. (Full article...)

At least 2 points, birthday and 1 year old FAC. 1,200 characters exactly. buffbills7701 23:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's an untenable argument for me! I can not see myself supporting the consequence; for process alone. It's simply counterintuitive to me; and certainly not a big deal either. I still support the nomination. And the publishers discretion; of course.—John Cline (talk) 11:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]