Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 May 13
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Xlate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per WP:TFD#REASONS #3, this template is not used and has no likelihood of being used. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Sir Sputnik (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Uw4mu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Very poor grammar version of uw-4im that misquotes policy. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- G5 and block the creator. This is clearly another account operated by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User 28062F033EOF457DC93EEFAABBET2C3, who has spent the month or so creating awful duplicates of warning templates (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Template:Uw-wnr4im for some of the previous discussions RE this editor's template creations). 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 May 20. Izno (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Arusha_Rural_District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Arusha_District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Di-no non-free use rationale-notice. Izno (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Missing rationale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Di-no non-free use rationale-notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Missing rationale with Template:Di-no non-free use rationale-notice.
This template (Missing rationale) needs to be merged because it seems to have an similar wording. Missing rationale was often used in the 2000s before Di-no non-free use rationale-notice, and most people do not use "Missing rationale" anymore. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The first one is meant for when a file has only been tagged with a boilerplate rationale template and the second is where there is no rationale at all, but I think there's no major issue merging them if the first one isn't being used. Stifle (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.