Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 20
Crss templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Crss (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Crss-AA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Crss-CK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Crss-CS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Crss-NK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Crss-OV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Crss-WF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused templates, and not needed. Their purpose seems to be to add those flag colours to articles, but we don't add random team colours to scorecards on the cricket WikiProject. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all - These template are wrappers to display team colour images eg File:Auckland Aces colours.svg. Are these team-colour "flags" real or just made up from the team colours? The Auckland "flag" appears in the Auckland cricket team infobox (not using the template under discussion) and in English cricket team in New Zealand in 1977–78 (which does use the template). I assume that 1978 is way before these colours were invented. All-in-all I'm struggling to see any point in these images at all, let alone the wrappers under discussion. Nigej (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:CCEW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused template and not needed. I have literally no idea why it's using CCEW and not CCC, but it doesn't save much effort to use this template anyway Joseph2302 (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: It looks unused because it's substitution only (compare {{fc}}). Such templates are specifically catered for in the template guidelines. As for the name, it did used to be called CCC but was renamed 7 years ago (see the discussion) - for what it's worth, I think it's a stupid name too. BigDom (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Ashes series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only used twice, and not needed, as we have links to previous/next series in the infobox anyway, as well as Template:Ashes Test series which includes all series and is transcluded on most Ashes series pages Joseph2302 (talk) 17:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Template for adding succession boxes. Clearly not a style used any more, duplicating navigation elsewhere in the articles. Nigej (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Ethnic issues (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
"Ethnic issues" (the wording is so vague its even a redlink) is weasle wording for racism. Every single "Ethnic issues in foo" page is either redirected to a "Racism in foo" article or in the process of being moved to a "Racism in foo" page. ★Trekker (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete not a proper term. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Navboxes should not contain many red links. This one is almost entirely red links. Useless, besides being conceptually dubious. Hairy Dude (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
2011 Friends Life t20 templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:2011 Friends Life t20 North Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2011 Friends Life t20 South Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Templates used once, should just be substed and deleted Joseph2302 (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Subst/Delete to 2011 Twenty20 Cup where it should be. Nigej (talk) 18:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:TVRADIOMED (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused navbox with unknown purpose, maybe a test. Only other edits by creator are to User:Akuma1984/sandbox. Appears to be a modified copy of {{Morris Multimedia}}, {{Forum Communications}} and other navboxes. I haven't found a meaning of TVRADIOMED or 546654. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Some sort of abandoned test. Nigej (talk) 16:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. What a weird mashup of things I'm familiar with as an editor in WP:TVS... Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unusable in its current form. It may serve a better purpose when more notable subjects are known, but not when there's only one such notable driver. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails everything about WP:NAVBOX. Nigej (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete only 1 link, so no template needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unusable in its current form; typical navboxes are meant to link at least 4 subjects, and given Andorra's current borders, I do not see a change in the future that would warrant this template. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Little use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 11:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete only 2 countries in nav box, so not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unusable in its current form; not enough available links for the subject and only link present in the template is a redlink. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Template creator is suspected of editing while logged out. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Absolutely no use for navigation, see WP:NAVBOX. Nigej (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete only one country borders San Marino:Italy. So no need for a template. Also would be non defining even if multiple countries bordered the country. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Redundant Template:Infobox court case wrappers
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox court case. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox English case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox US court case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox SCI case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox U.S. Courts of Appeals case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox New York COA case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox court case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging the above with Template:Infobox court case.
Merge these redundant wrappers of {{Infobox court case}}, which just pass the parameters through untouched. Only difference, and only in some cases, is a preset value for |court=
but this is redundant (should be set on the transclusion). Generally these have unmaintained and inadequate documentation, which is another reason why they're inferior. See this TfD for full rationale + precedent. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Merge all not complicated enough to warrant a wrapper. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).