Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 16 February 18 >

February 17

[edit]

Template:Seizure warning

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was substitute and delete. (non-admin closure) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 15:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not used anywhere, likely because consensus is that we do not use disclaimers. Natureium (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Save I'll change my mind when you prove that a warning (defined as: a statement that indicates a possible or impending danger, problem, or other unpleasant situation) is somehow possibly a disclaimer (defined as: any statement intended to specify or delimit the scope of rights and obligations that may be exercised and enforced by parties in a legally recognized relationship). Until then, this should not be deleted. —FORMALDUDE(talk) 23:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Suicidal content

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not put disclaimers on articles. Natureium (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • save This is simply not true. While I would not call them disclaimers, as they don't fall under the guidelines of WP:NDA, there is precedence for adding warnings. Such warnings are already in use, like Template:Seizure warning. —FORMALDUDE(talk)
Doesn't look like this is in use anywhere. Natureium (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you delete that too then? I mean, screw the epileptics, right? —FORMALDUDE(talk) 23:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair suggestion, since there's no point in keeping a template when consensus is against its use. Natureium (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You make it quite difficult to have a humane discussion. —FORMALDUDE(talk) 23:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is on the edge of a strawman fallacy, as it clearly is not censorship to inform readers of the type of content they can expect. —FORMALDUDE(talk) 23:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We do not censor articles or warn about content. There, better? It would behoove you not to bludgeon this discussion to death. CUPIDICAE💕 23:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Look, I just want to understand how a brief warning can possibly be constriued as censorship. Even WP:NOTCENSORED makes no mentions of the use of warnings. Is that too much to ask? —FORMALDUDE(talk) 00:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seven Great Rivers of China

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely redundant with Template:China Rivers. Ungulates (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jimmy Cauty

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:The KLF, as Cauty has been an active half of the duo, and the template repeats the same links. — Kochas 14:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-split

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 24. Izno (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_17&oldid=1008768060"