Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 12
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Template:No Authority (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only links 3 articles that aren't just a record label or another artist the band played with. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 18:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as a clear case of WP:NENAN. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 17:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 25. Primefac (talk) 01:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Wt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
only links three films ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, unneeded. Geschichte (talk) 12:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NENAN. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 17:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Manisaspor has plummeted and is currently a fourth-tier team. No players are notable. Navboxes are meant for nagivating between actual articles. Geschichte (talk) 09:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, there is no point to having a navbox which only applies to one article. Terasail[Talk] 19:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Mfd notice 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Redundant to Template:Mfd notice (formerly called Template:MFDWarning), which predates this template by a decade (and which is used in gadgets like twinkle).
This RM discussion standardised the naming of XfD notice templates. This template was originally called "Mfd notice", but after that RM, it was moved to "Mfd notice 2" to vacate the earlier title to make way for moving Template:MFDWarning to that title. – SD0001 (talk) 07:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant to the one mentioned which is part of the twinkle templates meaning it's the one which most users will use. --Gonnym (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Boito operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
In light of the new deletion discussions for opera templates. That being said, this one stands out as Boito only wrote two operas (I checked Grove – meaning it's not because we don't have them all on WP) so navigation here is useless. Both articles would (ideally) have the other opera mentioned in their lead anyways. Aza24 (talk) 04:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom, + collapsed info is not good for accessibility. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Now redundant to {{Arrigo Boito}} (footer navbox) which is the preferred position and has links to his libretti as well. Plus, the sidebar hides the image on the mobile platform and blocks far more relevant and illustrative images from the lede. Voceditenore (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- I kind of like the header templates: I was on Wikipedia for years before I realised people were shoving navigation stuff down by the footnotes. But the mobile issue is a problem. If we're going to do this, we need to recode 'em to something that isn't going to disappear on mobile, or at least will degrade gracefully into an image. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 09:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).