Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 6

< February 5	February 7 >

February 6[edit]

Template:Companies based in Udaipur[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Companies based in Udaipur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

created by several socks, contains very few actual links, the rest are red links and otherwise unlinked as they don't exist. doesn't seem useful as a template. Praxidicae (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as useless (other than perhaps as a honeypot for spam). If fully populated would be cumbersome and not helpful to readers. --kingboyk (talk) 16:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak-ishly keep as we do generally like to keep such templates. Instead, long-term WP:AUTOCONFIRMED or template protect this template. --Doug Mehus T·C 01:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

based on what? We don’t keep templates that are full of red links or in this case, no links. Praxidicae (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete, navboxes are for navigation between articles. the better method for navigation is to use Category:Organisations based in Udaipur, which doesn't require updating each time an article is created/deleted and doesn't suffer from WP:OR concerning member inclusion. Frietjes (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Why We Fight[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Why We Fight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, apparently deprecated in favour of Template:Frank Capra. kingboyk (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Doug Mehus T·C 01:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete, duplicates a section in Template:Frank Capra. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as substantial duplication under WP:CSD#T3. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).