Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 16 December 18 >

December 17

[edit]

Module:London Stock Exchange

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Women's Rugby World Cup Unions

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as a Women's Rugby World Cup Union, these are already covered by {{World Rugby}}. This would also duplicate the navbox {{Women's national rugby teams}} if it actually linked to the teams that have or have not played in the RWC instead of linking to the governing bodies that oversee both men's and women's sports or rugby union in articles - it does both randomly. Thus, unnecessary, duplicative, incorrect, and now unused template. Bob247 (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unnecessary sandboxes 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(50 templates) Reason: The same as last time. --TheImaCow (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sunni leaders

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G5, User:IslamMyLoveMyLife. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely imprecise scope, and used for very dubious purpose: How are these people 'Sunni leaders' when the concept of Sunni did not even exist for say, Muhammad, and when the actions of half the people on this list gave birth to the distinction between Shi'a and Sunni Islam? How is Fatima specifically a 'Sunni' leader? For that matter, *what* is a Sunni leader supposed to be? This is yet another POV-pushing effort by the template creator to claim the early Alids as 'Sunni'... Constantine ✍ 18:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Blank editnotices

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everthing is blank and unused. These notices contained Template:AbortionGSEN, which was removed everywhere. See also here and here. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Achilles'29 squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template still in work since its creation over a decade ago. Izno (talk) 05:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Conference bowl record

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_17&oldid=996270214"