Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 20:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While contributing to a related RfD discussion, Uanfala (and others, including myself) raised a useful question about the usefulness of this template (Template:RFL). So, I thought I'd propose this for discussion, which could include deleting, redirecting to Template:Reflist, keeping, or some other avenue. Doug Mehus (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 03:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template for a deleted promotional article (PetroWagon) whose author is blocked for promotional editing. MER-C 17:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

EFL Trophy standings templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and multiple prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused and unnecessary since the team season articles are transcluding the sections from the main article directly. Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. A reasonable nomination. While consensus can change and, as far as I'm aware, deletion discussions do not necessarily set precedent, the consensus here was unanimous that this template was not helpful. (non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T·C 01:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per past consensus (such as here, here and here), tournament squad navboxes are not used on the club level, only for major international football competitions (World Cup and main continental competitions, men and women). There is also a longstanding consensus to not have championship winning club squad templates in football, as there are too many competitions for this to be viable. Information regarding the squad can already be found at 1970–71 Panathinaikos F.C. season and 1971 European Cup Final. S.A. Julio (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. S.A. Julio (talk) 15:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).