Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 21
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Out-of-date navbox for a city council whose members are not inheritably notable. None of the people have articles. See this similar discussion. ミラP 03:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- delete per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 14:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:25, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Richmond City Council (Richmond, California) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Navbox on a city council whose members are not inheritably notable, with two blue members being mayors of that city, and the other one a redirect. See this similar discussion I did. ミラP 03:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- delete per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Pgn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Work around for a problem arising from Category talk: and Help talk: namespaces not having subpages enabled in 2009 which can be read about on the talk page. This is no longer the case and is currently useless. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- delete, most of these features are provided by Module:Page. Frietjes (talk) 14:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
After a clean-up effort to merge/redirect all WP:N-tagged B5 episode articles, there are only 6 episode articles left, which are linked from Template:Babylon 5 now. No need for this template anymore. – sgeureka t•c 09:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete under WP:CSD#T3 as substantial duplication. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 11:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).