Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 28
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Useless navbox with no bluelinks and no transclusions in mainspace. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:32, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 02:44, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 January 5. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a little hard to explain, but this template does not have a single, coherent subject. It was created based on a misconception that actual co-productions (where at least one of Nickelodeon's studio teams was involved) are the same as acquired shows they just financed from other copyright owners. I was originally going to request a move, since "co-production" is not an accurate term for most of these shows, but none of the article links are related. The template mostly lists unrelated shows from other companies that happened to air on Nick / receive some financial support from them, and there are only a few actual co-productions, which are not the same thing. Even these few are not related to each other and Nick has never used the word "co-productions" as a grouping for their shows, as the co-productions are generally completely separate productions with different studios involved and no reason to be grouped together.
The categories already on the articles, ex. 1990s Nickelodeon shows, suffice. These shows are also already listed on List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. It is just confusing to try to group them in a template with an inaccurate term. Capcapandgengen (talk) 17:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no actual relation between these shows. Hammill Ten (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep I do not know the relationship of some projects with Nick, but the telenovelas are related to the company, for example Yo soy Franky, which was later made by Nick in an English version for the American public, some Latin American productions if they belong to Nick , since they were created with financial support from other companies for Nick. Bradford (Talk) 05:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Delete as per nomination. Bradford (Talk) 07:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)- The template Template:Nickelodeon telenovelas had the telenovelas covered, which as you said, actually were made by Nick (but not "co-productions" in all cases). Maybe a solution would be to redirect/merge the "co-productions" template to the telenovelas one, which I restored. Capcapandgengen (talk) 06:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I talked a bit about this on the Template talk:Nickelodeon original series#Power Rangers. Like the Power Rangers shows, almost none of these shows are really Nickelodeon Studios productions so Wikipedia shouldn't list them as Nick co-productions. SBSPfan (talk) 21:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).