Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in userspace of creator, who has been inactive since 2013. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

IPL Flag icons

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

replicates flag templates that were previously deleted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_June_7#Template:Cr-IPL/Flags Spike 'em (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Created by a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a banned user per SPI, speedy deleted per CSD G5 ~ mazca talk 19:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, needless POV template. Similar to other meaningless POV templates created by this user. Gotitbro (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Created by a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a banned user per SPI, speedy deleted per CSD G5 ~ mazca talk 19:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, needless POV template. Gotitbro (talk) 12:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Created by a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a banned user per SPI, speedy deleted per CSD G5 ~ mazca talk 19:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, needless POV template. Gotitbro (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 December 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. per nominator. Created by sock of blocked user. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not in use, and probably can not be in use. The author made a bunch of useless POV templates and articles. Ymblanter (talk) 06:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. Gotitbro (talk) 07:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link, unlikely for more Fuddle (talk) 04:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).