Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 17

< December 16	December 18 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Module:AUshield (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in userspace of creator, who has been inactive since 2013. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, can be restored if the user resurfaces. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

IPL Flag icons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cripl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-CSK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-DC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-KXIP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-KKR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-MI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-RR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-RCB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cripl-SRH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replicates flag templates that were previously deleted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_June_7#Template:Cr-IPL/Flags Spike 'em (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Gonnym (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the previous TfD. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gimubrc (talk) 21:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Color icons are used for quick identification of respective teams. Flagicons have been used for national teams. Why we can't follow same procedure? Selva15469 (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the previous discussions on similar templates and the discussion at the cricket wiki project. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistani operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Created by a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a banned user per SPI, speedy deleted per CSD G5 ~ mazca ^talk 19:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pakistani operations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, needless POV template. Similar to other meaningless POV templates created by this user. Gotitbro (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, generally duplicates Template:Inter-Services Intelligence. Frietjes (talk) 15:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afghan operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Created by a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a banned user per SPI, speedy deleted per CSD G5 ~ mazca ^talk 19:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Afghan operations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, needless POV template. Gotitbro (talk) 12:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom, OR/POV. Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:G5 of Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami) (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Cabayi (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Created by a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a banned user per SPI, speedy deleted per CSD G5 ~ mazca ^talk 19:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indian operations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, needless POV template. Gotitbro (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom, provides little useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:G5 of Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami) (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Cabayi (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navalranks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 December 25. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navalranks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Military_ranks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AfghanTerrorism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. per nominator. Created by sock of blocked user. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AfghanTerrorism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not in use, and probably can not be in use. The author made a bunch of useless POV templates and articles. Ymblanter (talk) 06:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. Gotitbro (talk) 07:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pinky Dinky Doo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pinky Dinky Doo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one link, unlikely for more Fuddle (talk) 04:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the two articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gimubrc (talk) 18:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).