Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 8

< August 7	August 9 >

August 8

LACMTAML s-line templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LACMTAML color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LACMTAML lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LACMTAML stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LACMTAML style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

s-line data modules
Template:S-line/LACMTAML left/Orange (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:S-line/LACMTAML left/Silver (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:S-line/LACMTAML right/Orange (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:S-line/LACMTAML right/Silver (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{s-line}} templates for the Los Angeles Metro Busway. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Los Angeles Metro Busway. All transclusions replaced. There are four dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 22:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and past consensus to migrate to Adjacent stations module. BLAIXX 15:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Polvina and the Errors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Polvina and the Errors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recently created navbox that is only used in one draft article. At best this is completely unnecessary. Before cleanup, the navbox contained 88 links to a fan wiki operated by the navbox creator. Now it contains (for reasons known only to the navbox creator) 5 links to astronomical bodies, 3 links to articles that may or may not be related and 1 link to an article that doesn't exist. The last link was to Draft:Polvina and the Errors, which doesn't look like getting out of draft space any time soon, but navboxes shouldn't link to drafts. AussieLegend (✉) 05:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Further to the nomination, I have nominated the parent article for this template, Draft:Polvina and the Errors, for deletion as there is no evidence that this is an actual program. It appears to be a hoax created by the draft's creator. When the draft was rejected in June with the comment "No sources to show this is an actual series" the page creator responded with "well I'm trying to create the show". I have since asked him twice whether this is an actual program,[1][2] but he has not responded making me believe that the article is indeed a hoax. The only sources for that and other related articles is a fan wiki operated by the page creator, who seems to be its only contributor and who appears to be using Wikipedia as a webhost for his creation. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dan D-Noy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dan D-Noy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The musician's template consists of three links: the musician's article, a single redirected back to the artist and four record labels that should not be listed in the template. With only one link and no notable releases, there are not enough links to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 03:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the two articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Calibre (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Calibre (musician) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The musician's template consists of one link: the musician's article. The musician has no notable releases, so the navigational template navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 03:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).