Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 26

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only two films ―Justin (koavf)TCM 19:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:WP1.0 with WPCD=yes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template associated with a now-defunct wikiproject: WIkipedia:WPCD. I came across it on a talk page. I don't see the point in keeping this- all that it does these days is clutter up the templates at the top of the associated talk pages. Jip Orlando (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, {{WP1.0|WPCD=yes}} is a superior target. Support that. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 09:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deletion. (CSD G7) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page was inadvertently created and was blanked by the author because the existence of the page makes the documentation subpage generate many errors. This is a speedy delete {{db-author}} request per discussion at User talk:BrandonXLF#Module:Location map/data which includes comment Special:Diff/861144140 by the author indicating that tagging the page for deletion is tricky. I didn't want to put a tag on the doc page because it seems to have some magic purpose that I don't want to take time to investigate. Johnuniq (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).