Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 28

< March 27	March 29 >

March 28[edit]

Template:Buffalo Bills Hall of Famers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Buffalo Bills Hall of Famers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only causes clutter and is unneeded. RoyalsLife 22:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not really a valid reason for deletion. Navigation templates are usually fine when they provide navigation between related articles (see WP:NAV). We have an article titled List of Buffalo Bills in the Pro Football Hall of Fame that includes all of the players who have this honor for the Bills, thus a navigation template for those players is easily justifiable. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete template as it causes WP:TCREEP. – Sabbatino (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TCREEP. Inductees already have non-team specific HOF navboxes. Team-specific ones add to the clutter, moreso in the common case where they played for multiple teams. Having a standalone article is necessary but not sufficient for having a navbox.—Bagumba (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have no opinion whether this navbox should stay or go at this time, but I do want to state that, in my opinion, this template meets all 5 criteria of WP:NAVBOX (the only one that some might consider questionable is #3). Ejgreen77 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Green Bay Packers Hall of Famers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Green Bay Packers Hall of Famers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only causes clutter and is unneeded. RoyalsLife 22:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Notified WP:PACKERS of this discussion. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not really a valid reason for deletion. Navigation templates are usually fine when they provide navigation between related articles (see WP:NAV). We have an article titled List of Green Bay Packers in the Pro Football Hall of Fame that includes all of the players who have this honor for the Packers, thus a navigation template for those players is easily justifiable. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete template as it causes WP:TCREEP. – Sabbatino (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TCREEP. Inductees already have non-team specific HOF navboxes. Team-specific ones add to the clutter, moreso in the common case where they played for multiple teams. Having a standalone article is necessary but not sufficient for having a navbox.—Bagumba (talk) 17:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have no opinion whether this navbox should stay or go at this time, but I do want to state that, in my opinion, this template meets all 5 criteria of WP:NAVBOX (the only one that some might consider questionable is #3). Ejgreen77 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philadelphia Eagles Pro Football Hall of Famers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philadelphia Eagles Pro Football Hall of Famers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only causes clutter. It is unneeded along with the others. RoyalsLife 22:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Without a relevant page (List of Philadelphia Eagles in the Pro Football Hall of Fame is a redirect), this template should be deleted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete template as it causes WP:TCREEP. – Sabbatino (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TCREEP. Inductees already have non-team specific HOF navboxes. Team-specific ones add to the clutter, moreso in the common case where they played for multiple teams.—Bagumba (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MasterChef Pakistan[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MasterChef Pakistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates between one season and one winner, which can be achieved through normal linking. --wooden superman 15:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way too sparse to be worth keeping. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 04:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RTÉ Sport[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 11. Primefac (talk) 14:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RTÉ_Sport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Celebrity Bainisteoir[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 11. Primefac (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Celebrity_Bainisteoir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek time travel stories[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 11. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Star_Trek_time_travel_stories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soviet Barnstar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 11. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Soviet_Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Soviet_Union_Barnstar_of_National_Merit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PRC Barnstar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 11. Primefac (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PRC_Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's_Republic_of_China_National_Merit_Medal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).