Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 7

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:NCAA Season 94 juniors basketball. Plausible redirect. Primefac (talk) 02:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially a duplicate of Template:NCAA Season 94 juniors basketball. This article uses the template other basketball tournament articles are using, unlike this one. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:NCAA Season 94 seniors basketball. Plausible redirect term. Primefac (talk) 02:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially a duplicate of Template:NCAA Season 94 seniors basketball. This article uses the template other basketball tournament articles are using, unlike this one. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Not enough links to justify one. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No objections. This template has always challenged the limits of WP:UNDUE. Probably has survived as long as it has only because it is so, so little used. Jojalozzo (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the articles listed have been redirected per AFD, making this template unnecessary The editor whose username is Z0 13:18, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).