Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 19

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 30. Primefac (talk) 01:30, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Alex Shih (talk) 12:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an attempt to create an article. See also Draft:Pritam Mandal Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

RC Narbonne and US Dax squad templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 27. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 03:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Author approved (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 03:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This template was a good idea, but the articles (stock (food) and broth) now use labeled section transclusion instead. Deleting this will avoid confusion. —Neil P. Quinn (talk) 02:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fine to me. Please delete. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).