Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 18

< January 17	January 19 >

January 18

Template:PLDT Home Ultera Ultra Fast Hitters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PLDT Home Ultera Ultra Fast Hitters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used in one article Frietjes (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Generika Lifesavers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Generika Lifesavers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused in one article Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cignal HD Spikers (Women's)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cignal HD Spikers (Women's) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

provides no navigation Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

UK TOCs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:UK TOCs. This has already been carried out, so a TROUT to the nominator for doing things out of process (even though it was unanimous). Primefac (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current UK TOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Defunct UK TOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Future UK TOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Current UK TOCs with Template:Defunct UK TOCs.

Propose merging 3 templates Template:Current UK TOCs, Template:Defunct UK TOCs and Template:Future UK TOCs. They each cross-link but this is problematic, in that when clicked, they take the user out of the main article space and into a separate template, which is not good practice. I propose merging these three templates into a single template using Template:Navbox with collapsible groups. This will ensure users are not directed out of the article namespace, reduce unnecessary proliferation of templates and make it easier to make future updates (e.g. when a franchise is changed). The result will look something like this:

I think this will be an improvement. Cnbrb (talk) 17:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This would work well, neat and tidy. But I think it would be better if Current was at the top. Steven (Editor) (talk) 22:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I'd say current defunct future. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 01:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge No preference to the position. I don't mind. But this makes things much more accessible to the reader. !dave 19:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done The merge seems uncontroversial, so as 7 days have passed, it seems safe to press on. New content can be found at Template:UK TOCs. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 10:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Military deception/operation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Military deception/operation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template - was used by parent in 2012, is no longer, no uses. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 16:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Israel Railways lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Israel Railways lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Stub that hasn't been updated for 6 months, no category. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 16:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Steven (Editor) (talk) 22:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Albanian Progressive Party/meta/color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 01:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Albanian Progressive Party/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Albanian People's Party/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Agrarian National Union/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Coalition of Bulgarian Social Democrats/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Free Georgia/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Himachal Vikas Congress/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, per prior deletion of unused meta/color templates. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, unused. Steven (Editor) (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).