Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 25
August 25
[edit]Idaho TV network affiliation templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:TV Stations Idaho. Primefac (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:CBS Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:ABC Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:CW Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fox Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:MNTV Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NBC Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PBS Idaho (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Other Idaho Stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
These templates should all be merged into Template:TV Stations Idaho as the TV stations could be sorted by network affiliation in one template such as in Template:TV Stations North Dakota and Template:TV Stations Montana. 2601:587:100:6d8:f905:7f02:f503:f21b (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Merge as proposed by nominator. Seems a good proposal. --Bsherr (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have notified of this TfD at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Idaho, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations, and Talk:List of television stations in Idaho. --Bsherr (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Merge It's a smaller state with few stations; I see no objection to merging this together appropriately. I'll keep an eye on this and if a merge is agreed to, I'll help with the process. Nate • (chatter) 04:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Uw-patrolled (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is from before New page patrollers were given a separate user right, the wording advises users to mark pages as reviewed, which most users cannot do. I propose deleting this template as it is unlikely that it can be turned into something meaningful. Danski454 (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete few transclusions and outdated. Mr rnddude (talk) 23:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have added a TfD notice at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. --Bsherr (talk) 19:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete there's a better template for welcoming new page reviewers that's currently being used after granting the user right. wumbolo ^^^ 19:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
New, unused, template. Right now it mostly just duplicates Template:Immigration to Denmark. All the links included are to Denmark foreign relations articles (including the main link). As such, it is misleading and I don't see what purpose it would serve. Paul_012 (talk) 14:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Bsherr (talk) 19:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).