Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And here is number three, the third template for a sub-group of a band; it goes nowhere, and the sub-group's article is redirected. Drmies (talk) 22:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another template that goes nowhere; article is now redirected. Drmies (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template that almost literally goes nowhere for a group with highly questionable notability. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Had several non-notable entries removed, now fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template full of redlinks. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The information is already at St John Ambulance Ranks and Insignia. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not what template space is for Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eraserheads album tracks templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only 3 songs from each of these track list templates have their own articles, but all of them are already and more appropriately linked in the {{Eraserheads}} navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel-compact4. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ahnentafel4 with Template:Ahnentafel-compact4.
Wikipedia:Family trees lists a lot of options, including Template:Chart for vertical presentation. For horizontal, there are several ahnentafel options, categorised inside Category:Ahnentafel formatting templates. Throughout biographical articles, clearly, the compact option seems to be the prevalent ones, more specifically Template:Ahnentafel-compact5. I do recognise that different options regarding number of generations are legitimate. However, I suppose a little bit of standardisation other than that could serve the readers more convienently. In case of an eventual merge, I would suggest retaining AhnentafelX as the final name (the more compact design being implicated). Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, not as far as this proposal is concerned. Chicbyaccident (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel-compact5. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ahnentafel5 with Template:Ahnentafel-compact5.
Please see above. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. We do not need multiple templates doing the same thing with only a slight variation. Should actually merge these further to have just a single template for this with various parameters. The numbering system is all boogered, too, since several of these have been deleted.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  02:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel-compact6. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ahnentafel6 with Template:Ahnentafel-compact6.
Please see above. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to be useful. --woodensuperman 09:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).