Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 8. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 17:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move per the comments below. Primefac (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

move to article space, and redirect to preserve attribution after the nominator merged it without attribution. Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 8. Primefac (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that links these cities is that they are all sister cities of Phoenix. That's not a defining characteristic and would lead to countless additional infoboxes if this was used more widely (e.g. Phoenix would have at the bottom 10 such boxes, one for "sister cities of Calgary", one for Catania, and so on). Fram (talk) 11:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Major League Lacrosse. Primefac (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merged to Template:Major Lacrosse League - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 06:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Chesapeake Bayhawks. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template content was just added to Template:Chesapeake Bayhawks, now duplicate - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 06:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 8. Primefac (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).