Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 7

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 17 Primefac (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 17 Primefac (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike US states, there is no need in Mexico for navboxes of stations by network because most would be redirects. The final three templates using this template are all up for TfD below (Azteca 7 Chihuahua, Azteca 13 Chihuahua, Other Chihuahua Stations), and without them, there's no reason to keep this around either. Raymie (tc) 06:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the deletion nomination for Azteca 7 Chihuahua: of the seven pages linked here, only three are their own articles, with the other four being redirects to Azteca Trece; any future pages that could apply to this template would also be redirects. Raymie (tc) 06:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox links to 10 pages, including three stations struck from the official books in recent years (some of which may never have operated), three repeaters of a single national network, one station repeating another on this list, leaving a potential three articles to use this template. It's not an aid to navigation as the three stations (XHABC, XHMH and XHIJ) share little in common besides being in the same state. Raymie (tc) 06:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a major aid to navigation. Unlike in the US, most Mexican TV stations (if a "station" is defined by a unique callsign) simply repeat national TV networks and their pages are redirects. Two articles and two redirects make this a template that will never have more than one or two unique articles to link to. Raymie (tc) 06:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Television in Ciudad Cuauhtémoc is pretty much a subset of Chihuahua Capital, with no less than four repeaters of the exact same stations (and callsigns). Of the three stations that are "unique" to Cuauhtémoc - XHCTH, XHCCH, and XHCHU - two relay national networks and are thus redirects, and the third is a repeater of a station in Chihuahua and redirects to that service. All the articles with this template have {{Chihuahua TV}} transcluded which is, for the purposes of the encyclopedia, a superset of this template. Raymie (tc) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 22:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not an aid to navigation; links to just one article that is not a redirect, and that article is likely to become one soon. Raymie (tc) 06:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).