Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 04:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-defining internal club award, no article on topic, not sourced or even mentioned in Rangers F.C. article. Jellyman (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 04:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor football club template with no navigational benefit - apart from the club itself, only other link is to the league they play in. No other club-related articles that could be included. Jellyman (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G4 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Previously deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 5#Template:Arrow ratings and Template:The Flash ratings. Alex|The|Whovian? 17:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 4. Primefac (talk) 04:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old unused fork of template:aircraft specs. Frietjes (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 04:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates Airlines of the Kingdom of Denmark which has entries for both the airlines in this template. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, pointless duplication. Even if it wasn't, too few links to be useful anyway. Jellyman (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Meh created a dozen years ago. Who cares? Two entries is somewhat pointless, the original point was to bring some kind of consistency to each country's airlines, but whatever. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; provides navigation between articles on non-defining dimension. Jweiss11 (talk) 06:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).