Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 3
August 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
unused Frietjes (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Template:TLS-F (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused combination of other templates. "Year in spaceflight" articles now use {{TLS-R}} to list generic references. — JFG talk 21:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn/redirect to Template:Soft drink. I just discovered the existence of Template:Soft drink, and it has a number of transclusions. For that reason, I'm going to redirect this WP:BOLDly. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Soft drinks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is a navbox with only 1 transclusion. Most, if not all, articles linked in this navbox have other navboxes already present in them which encompass the links in this navbox, making this navbox redundant and possibly unnecessary. Steel1943 (talk) 19:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Double with the better quality Template:NPO The Banner talk 18:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- delete, and move {{NPO}} to {{Dutch public broadcasting system}} to match the title/scope of the navbox. Frietjes (talk) 16:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Alex Shih (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
double with the better quality template Template:Netherlands public broadcasting The Banner talk 17:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Template:PhDTree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
was nominated for speedy deletion because the site referred to is currently dead. I have no idea whether it will return, but hope this will stop the nominator from edit warring over the speedy tag. —Kusma (t·c) 10:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- In the first place, the PhDTree home page is dead and buried, and that alone should be sufficient reason to get rid of this Wikipedia page. Note that this page is the only contribution its author, User:Jack1898 , has ever made which immediately raises the suspicion that the only purpose of this page's existence is nothing but self-promotion i.e.: it is spam; that alone should raise a huge red flag.
Secondly, the PhDTree.org domain stands accused of spamming, see Scientific Spam Once again, that alone should suffice to zap this page: AFAIK Wikipedia has always taken a dim view of spammers, or is that perhaps changed since I left?
In the third place, PhDTree is notorious for plagiarism. It started of by wholesale copying the entire Mathematics Genealogy Project and the Academic Family Tree, and Proquest databases, and perhaps some other websites as well, without any acknowledgement whatsoever. I could demonstrate that in a minute if PhDTree were still alive. Clearcut case of plagiarism, Once again, it has always been my understanding that Wikipedia takes a dim view of plagiarism. JdH (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC) - delete, the site is dead. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).