Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 25

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 18:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not used on any pages and more detailed info boxes exists for the same purposeGaruda28 (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Little navigational benefit, as out of 32 teams listed only 8 link to articles, and of those the TeamBath and Sheffield F.C. articles don't even mention futsal. None of the season articles "linked to" exist either. The information presented is also outdated and incomplete. Jellyman (talk) 06:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not notable. GiantSnowman 18:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Barely a useful aid to navigation, many of those redlinks are non-notable teams anyway and I would argue some of the blue links are probablty not notable too given the low level of exposure Futsal has in the UK
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 May 5. Primefac (talk) 00:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and misnamed duplicate of the existing and correct Template:1942 college football independents records. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and misnamed duplicate of the existing and correct Template:2017 Division I FBS independents football standings. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two items in the navigation template: the band and a member. No recordings or anything that should be listed in a nav template. The creator seems to have been using it as a list. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).