Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 19

< April 18	April 20 >

April 19

Template:Ardabil Province Labelled Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ardabil Province Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one use. subst: and delete. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Apayao labelled map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Apayao labelled map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Albanian counties labelled map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Albanian counties labelled map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Africa Labelled Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Africa Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:White African residence map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:White African residence map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, only four links. Previous AFD closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:25, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as box is underpopulated and its premise of vague coverage seems rather unnecessary. --Katangais (talk) 04:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:John Pasquin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:John Pasquin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MissGrandCountries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MissGrandCountries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template dependent on an article that has been deleted at AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand International (3rd nomination)). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 17:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as the parent article has been deleted and salted at AFD. Legacypac (talk) 09:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:APAWiR2015

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:APAWiR2015 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tamaulipas TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 29 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tamaulipas TV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Headhunter series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Headhunter series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An unnecessary and redundant template article. There are two Headhunter games: Headhunter (video game) and Headhunter Redemption. Wikipedia guidelines stats that only a primary article is made when there's 3 video game articles in a series and an unrelated video game or media item. This doesn't seem to fall under that per WP:NCVG. Neverrainy (talk) 02:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, textbook WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Isotope list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No further opposition. Primefac (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Isotope list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Procedural nomination following the closing of this AFD. The articles these templates were used on are now deleted. Primefac (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per the reasons I set out in the AfD, where there was a strong consensus to delete these. Thanks for nominating them. Laurdecl ^talk 15:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 00:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also adding to this nomination: Template:Isolist and its subpages (Template:Isolist/m, Template:Isolist/ms/3i, etc), which were also used only for the now-deleted pages. Laurdecl ^talk 06:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:Accessibility. Although the fortunate sighted users can learn to read navbox {{isotope_index}} as a periodic table format, those of us with limited sight are helped by the lists of full element names in Template:Isotope_list, where we can even text-search for "gold" or "silv" or "uran" to find the element link to click. Unless a sighted user knows symbol "Ag" is silver, then even many users would prefer using {{Isotope_list}} rather than {Isotope_Index} to click between the various isotope pages. Keep per wp:Accessibility. -Wikid77 (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note: only {{isotope list}} has been relisted. Its subpages (nominated here) received no opposition to deletion. I'm relisting this in order to potentially address the ACCESS concerns.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Laurdecl, Headbomb, and The Mysterious El Willstro: please see the above ACCESS concerns. If you still are in favour of deletion of {{isotope list}}, you do not have to reply (your previous delete !vote will still stand). Primefac (talk) 02:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is still a delete for me. {{Isotope list}}, is unused. If there are accessibility concerns with the periodic table format, then that template should be improved with alt texts or whatever. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. If someone is searching for isotope data tables then they known what the symbol for silver is. Also, they can use the full name in the search box. @Primefac: What about Template:Isolist and its subpages (Template:Isolist/m, Template:Isolist/ms/3i, etc), which Headbomb also tagged for deletion? Also used only in the now deleted article. Laurdecl ^talk 02:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laurdecl, I thought they were deleted; the script must have missed them. Primefac (talk) 02:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WNBA labeled map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WNBA labeled map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

/subst. Only used in one article--no need to be a separate document. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Koavf: Also a serious TfD nomination. Eye snore 01:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per my comments on the Zambia template at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 29. Basically, with a big piece of code like this template, segregating the code onto a separate page reduces the risk of accidental damage to the page. Nobody needs to edit this code in normal circumstances, and in the rare situation such as this where you have lots of complicated code whose modification will make a mess without being obvious when you look at the code, we should ensure that it's not edited by anyone who's not meaning to edit it. Nyttend (talk) 01:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom, as a template only used on one page. Ppp ery 17:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per User:Nyttend's comments above. --Katangais (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LTA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LTA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

LTA userpage tag that never caught on. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not used. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).