Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 September 15
September 15
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 23 (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Automata theory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 23 (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Capital Kings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
One link is not enough to navigate... WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 00:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support The number of redlinks makes it a list, not a nav box. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).