Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 September 1

< August 31	September 2 >

September 1

Template:Learjet aircraft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Learjet_aircraft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox does not contain anything that Template:Bombardier_aircraft does not have. Delete and replace (where not already present) with above mentioned navbox. Ruslik_Zero 20:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Template:Bombardier aircraft. No need to delete. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but refactor to bring together Bill Lear, his designs, possibly other aviation companies and related aircraft such as LearAvia Lear Fan. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep although we have some overlap they are not exactly the same thing as GraemeLeggett has pointed out Lear was also involved in other projects (also some of the aircraft in the Bombardier template are not actually Bombardier products as they go back to Learjet days, some confusion perhaps between Learjet the product and Learjet the company. MilborneOne (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GraemeLeggett. Mjroots (talk) 17:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disambiguation-stop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 September 10. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:46, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alma (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation template with nothing to navigate between The Banner talk 10:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with only two links. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, does not provide sufficient navigation. Frietjes (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the pages will be added later.--Prisencolin (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete, Prisencolin (talk · contribs) mostly creates eSports articles that aren't notable, none of the current players (outside of maybe S4) are notable, and you won't find much third-party coverage on them. For that reason, this template doesn't need to exist, as what good is a template with only one good link, as Notail shouldn't have an article either. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I mean, OG has been described as one of the best teams ever due to the two consecutive Major wins. Surely Fly would have an article too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prisencolin (talk • contribs) 21:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Can you find third party coverage on him? The only thing I've been able to find is just OG's team in general on places like ESPN and Yahoo, but nothing specifically on him (unlike Sumail, Fear, and Dendi, for example). And OG didn't even win consecutive Majors, so that's false. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Freudian slip, although they did win two majors. Yes there is plenty of coverage, and you just pointed it out. Contrary to claims made on some AfDs, there is no need for there to be coverage specifically about a player to be notable.--Prisencolin (talk)
Delete: Teams change all the time, this seems better suited for a dedicated wiki like Liquipedia and this hardly seems appropriate. There shouldn't be navboxes showcasing the roster of any team, regardless of whether they're SK Gaming, MYM, Fnatic, or a more centralized organization like OG or NewBee. DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 01:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I mean, it should be useful for navigation if there are four related articles? (almost certain JerAx, but not Ana is notable).--Prisencolin (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Dead Rabbitts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Dead Rabbitts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one notable album which leaves the main article, two members, one album and one "other link". Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, only connects three articles. Frietjes (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).