Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 4

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Xaosflux (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix template that only links three pages. Not very useful and the pages are already linked in the parent article. Legacypac (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Xaosflux (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix template that only links two pages. Not very useful. Legacypac (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after ensuring all articles are within Category:Interstate Highways in California. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 06:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to both List of Interstate Highways in California and Category:Interstate Highways in California. Per past precedents, the existence of a list and a category has been deemed to negate the need for the navbox. Such discussions include: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 21, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 6, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 16#Template:Georgia Interstate Highways. Imzadi 1979  05:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).