Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 March 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 13

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ RobTalk 13:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NOTABILITY. There is no need to chronicle a list of articles for county election results, which in turn are useless as well. Parsley Man (talk) 21:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisting here. ~ RobTalk 14:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed and there is not even an article for this. No template exists for previous seasons. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. ~ RobTalk 13:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-defining attribute. We shouldn't start creating templates for films for which festivals they were screened at. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. ~ RobTalk 13:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).