Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem to be a helpful navbox since it only has one link. -- Tavix (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete useless as a navbox with only one link --SuperJew (talk) 19:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unuseful —PC-XT+ 00:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deletedJohnCD (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a spelling mistake of Template:Fb team Wollongong Wolves. SuperJew (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deletedJohnCD (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't even represent a football team, but rather links to a college. SuperJew (talk) 10:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deletedJohnCD (talk) 19:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't even represent a football team, but rather links to a city. SuperJew (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deletedJohnCD (talk) 19:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't even represent a football team, but rather links to a town. SuperJew (talk) 08:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).