Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 29

< August 28	August 30 >

August 29

Template:EnciclopediaDeiPapi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 9 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EnciclopediaDeiPapi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SmithFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, unused and no strong opposition. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SmithFC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use external link template. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

replace with {{Flickr tag inline link}}. Frietjes (talk) 19:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- In this specific case, concerning Operation Windmill, it would be better to import the 18 copyright-free images to commons and link to the category there. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ...and this I have now done. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I thought I had transferred them all to Wiki Commons already, I left a few stragglers. We already have a Flickr Commons tag there. I believe we have a template at Commons specific to the Smithsonian for PD images. I had stopped loading images to Wikimedia Commons after about 100 PD-Bain images that I loaded were deleted. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SharedTree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SharedTree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Non-standard format. Only one link to the target site, on Wikipedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed Frietjes (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Webelements

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Webelements (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

External link template with no parameters. Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete after substitution. Frietjes (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless template. From the examples in its documentation:

{{WS|loc.gov}}: (web site)
{{WS|loc.gov|Library_of_Congress}}: (Library_of_Congress)

Only 38 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacing with {{URL}}. Frietjes (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- {{URL}} is only and specifically for use within other templates which emit microformats. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - in that case, replace with {{external link}}. Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stage magicians and illusionists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stage magicians and illusionists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Far too long to be realistically useful as a navigational aid, and requires too much subjective judgment as to who is famous enough to make the list. Purpose is better served by existing list articles such as List of magicians and subcategories of Category:Magicians. Psychonaut (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, better to use a category to avoid subjective inclusion. Frietjes (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Internet censorship circumvention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Internet censorship circumvention (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

half Chinese template The Banner talk 10:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Incoherent (at least in English). —Psychonaut (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Piperazines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 9 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Piperazines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Espoo Blues roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Espoo Blues roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

team is defunct, no need for a roster template Joeykai (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated to be included in the discussion. I concur with the nomination for deletion. (saint0wen (talk) 09:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]

delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).