Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 9

< March 8	March 10 >

March 9

Template:Balkan cities over 200,000 people

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Balkan cities over 200,000 people (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I moved the wikitable to the only article that uses it: Balkans#Urbanization. No need for template. Zoupan 21:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article table that should not be hidden in a template; nom already substed it. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:11, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
move to article space without redirect, then redirect to Balkans#Urbanization to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Frietjes —PC-XT+ 04:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:United Basketball League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United Basketball League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unusable navbox due to the fact that none of the teams have articles Tavix | Talk 21:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only 1 bluelink -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WikiProject Basketball does not sanction one-link and no-link navboxes, and this one violates the fundamental purpose behind navboxes: that they exist to facilitate navigation among existing articles. This one clearly fails: None of the 12 teams listed have stand-alone articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment regarding notice - WikiProject Basketball has been notified of this TfD: [1]. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, navigates nothing. Frietjes (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:A5 Coxeter plane graphs2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Why do we need the creator to comment here? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A5 Coxeter plane graphs2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Ricky81682: It appears the template creator has blanked the template page with the edit summary "unused." If we can get him to comment here, we can do a WP:G7 speedy delete. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cactus League and Template:Grapefruit League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cactus League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Grapefruit League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see any purpose to these templates: There are no pages for the Cactus or Grapefruit Leagues; both pages are redirects to Spring training. All teams are already linked together in {{MLB}}, meaning this is excessive. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite these should indicate their "home" stadiums in these leagues. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- {{Stadiums of the Grapefruit League}} and {{Stadiums of the Cactus League}} already exist. – Muboshgu (talk) 12:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nominator's rationale. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The stadium templates seem adequate to the purpose. Rlendog (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Adds nothing to what other templates already do. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Malaysian Federal Government

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Malaysian Federal Government (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wholly redundant to {{Infobox government agency}}. I've replaced one transclusion to demonstrate. Alakzi (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RedsBox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RedsBox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, following my replacement of its only transclusion in Cincinnati Reds NSH002 (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This never should have existed. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant, non-standard navbox that is inconsistent with the standards of WikiProject Baseball. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rlendog (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Twelve Gauge Valentine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, already userfied? If not, I can move it to userspace. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Twelve Gauge Valentine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just not enough related info to warrant a navbox. The band doesn't even have an article and the album articles may meet A9 speedy criteria, in which case this would become speediable under {{db-g8}}. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm still working on the artist page so it will be notable soon enough Metalworker14 (Yo) 4:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Even if you establish notability for the artist and the two albums listed in the navbox, there is no need for the navbox itself since it wouldn't further aid navigation as each of the listed articles would already in one way or another link to each other without it. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Okay then. Metalworker14 (Yo) 10:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.