Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 24
March 24
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Per precedents in previous deletion discussions, these templates are unnecessary and should be deleted. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- subst and then delete Christian75 (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- delete per precedent; redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, if you want to change the name try Wikipedia:Requested moves. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
new template, redundant to Template:Warner Bros. animation and comics. NSH002 (talk) 07:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Merge to have one singular template Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- comment I just wanted change in name if you do not like good leave it as it was DarkNight8000 (talk / edits) 13:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 April 3. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Subst to Cabinet of Lucas Papademos and delete. With a single remaining transclusion, the list can live in the article and the template isn't needed anymore. PanchoS (talk) 02:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support, no-brainer. Constantine ✍ 15:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.