Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 July 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 12

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy closed – fixed. (non-admin closure) Eyesnore 18:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got 404 response when going to https://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq (this also affects {{AMQ}} and {{FMQ}}). Eyesnore 20:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment someone already fixed the TVQ link to the correct new URL -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 07:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • All Stop: The FCC website is down, so none of the links listed are working at this time. AMQ, FMQ and TVQ work just fine when the FCC website is working. @Eyesnore: This TfD is premature, I would recommend withdrawing it. - NeutralhomerTalk10:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose The FCC website says "The normal FCC website is temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties. We are working to restore the full FCC website back to normal as soon as possible." Hasty action on our part will only cause problems down the line. (The FCC doesn't work weekends for non-critical infrastructure.) - Dravecky (talk) 11:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I called the FCC and they have been notified about the AMQ, FMQ and TVQ portions of their site being down. The person I just spoke to at the FCC didn't have an ETA when those areas of the FCC website would be back up and running. - NeutralhomerTalk12:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Online: As of about 10:20am EDT, the FCC website is slowly coming back online. Pages are a little slow to load still, but the website is back online. As such, I strongly oppose this TfD and I recommend it be withdrawn.- NeutralhomerTalk14:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Encourages young editors to publish all sorts of personal information they might later on regret doing. Alakzi (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.