Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 11
August 11
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was replace and redirect. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Auto images (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
this template is no longer needed after improvements to template:multiple image and <gallery>...</gallery>. Example of replacement with gallery and multiple rows with matched image heights. syntax for template:multiple image is nearly compatible with Auto images, so could probably redirect it. Frietjes (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- notify Peter coxhead. Frietjes (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- text overlap problems can be seen in Firefox in this version. Frietjes (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to {{multiple image}} and fix any resulting errors seems the best solution. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Replace the five transclusions, then redirect per Peter Coxhead. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Unanimous: Subst: and delete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Used twice after 5+ years. Should be substed/deleted. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Substitute then delete per nomAlgircal (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Subst and delete per nom -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Subst and delete per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Unanimous: Subst: then delete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Nbd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single-use template after 5+ years. Should be substed/deleted. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- substitute then delete per nomAlgircal (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- subst and delete per nom -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Subst and delete per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Template contains links to three articles bar the parent article. As a team in a non-fully professional league, it is difficult to see how many of these players could be notable and therefore how this template could ever really be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 10:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - The navbox template does not serve any navigational purpose, and is filled with the names of mostly non-notable footballers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.