Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 September 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Azerbaijani clubs in European football (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few links to justify this template, not needed. JMHamo (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Region history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary frontend for {{sidebar}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Upcoming contests (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was created only for a project that is inactive and it is unused. Rcsprinter123 (vent) @ 13:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Google videos (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The service has been shut down and all links appear to be broken.    FDMS  4    00:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not 100% sure how the English Wikipedia deals with dead reference templates, but existing template uses could get substituted and a {{dl}} added.    FDMS  4    09:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that's possible, even if we find a connection between Google Video IDs and YouTube IDs, a lot of former Google Video content might now be unaccessible: […] we’re moving the remaining hosted content to YouTube as private videos.    FDMS  4    01:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no easily predictable way to translate the url to YouTube, then my !vote for deletion stands. Any remaining substitutions can be marked dead so humans can fix them as appropriate. —PC-XT+ 04:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.