Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 September 22
September 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect (transclusions were mixed with {{top4}}/{{mid4}}, so closing this discussion with that one). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:22, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Mid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Bottom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
rarely used and redundant to the myriad of other Table and column templates, can be easily replaced (for example) with {{col-begin}}/{{col-2}}/{{col-end}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment these are imports from Wiktionary. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 08:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. These are redundant. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect as these are easier to remember shorthands than the col- series. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 01:06, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Obsolete "future episode information" editnotices
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 October 4 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by MSGJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:10, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
This editnotice, which expired on 22 September 2013, says "This article uses parenthetical referencing". I'm proposing this editnotice be deleted on the basis that the article no longer uses parenthetical referencing. DH85868993 (talk) 09:53, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- I deleted this under G7, but on reflection I think that blanking may have been preferable. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Template reliant on deleted (and salted) article for non-notable Miss Supranational pageant. When I looked at this before some of the links in the article didn't even appear to be genuine Miss Supranational deciders, making its accuracy dubious. Creator has a track record of apparent conflict-of-interest and promotional edits for articles relating to Miss Supranational, appears to be closely associated with the event, and is currently being investigated for their editing behaviour. Mabalu (talk) 08:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 22:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.