Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 November 22
November 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
A template with only three links, unneeded redundancy as they all appear on his main article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- When I was fixing the image I was thinking it was a rather useless template. Too bad, because the image fix was a nice improvement. Oh well. – JBarta (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per precedent set by similar sidebar TfDs —PC-XT+ 08:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Unused; contains only a <templatedata>
element. Reticulated Spline (t • c) 13:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- I would speedy delete it as a test, especially since it hasn't been touched in months —PC-XT+ 08:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete; I'll let it sit out there for another few hours. Bearian (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Template:BeginnerQuestion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:AdvancedQuestion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused; seemingly created for use at the Teahouse wishing well, but the sole reference to them was removed by their creator moments after they added it. Reticulated Spline (t • c) 12:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and notify the teahouse: Unused template, no sign of usage any time soon. George.Edward.C – Talk – Contributions 11:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This ranking was created by an non-notable organization, and has nothing to do with the University of Maryland. See Questions raised over high school rankings by Shenzhen Daily. E8xE8 (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
This is currently only used on one article, but was only created a couple days ago. I think a category would be better. —PC-XT+ 07:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC) 07:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- (It currently has no support for more than one small area of India, so if that functionality is not to be added, it should be renamed if kept.) —PC-XT+ 07:41, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete it looks like it is for boilerplate text, instead of a navbox. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 06:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - No forseeable usage, unless a switch is introduced to determine what area the article is about. George.Edward.C – Talk – Contributions 15:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete, I removed it from Immanuel School Zunheboto. Frietjes (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - confusing to the point of being useless. Bearian (talk) 01:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
This is article content in template space. It is used in one article, where a navbox would go. (A navbox may have been the original intention.) I would support userfication or merging with an article, if appropriate. —PC-XT+ 07:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.