Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 March 18

< March 17	March 19 >

March 18

Template:Infobox periodic table group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox periodic table group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Groups the subtemplates. See documentation. -DePiep (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The documentation says nothing to that effect. It says "At the moment, only subtemplate(s) are used. Together they open en [sic] close a wikitable." (my emphasis). The supposed subtemplates should be renamed {{Infobox periodic table group/header}} to, say, {{Infobox periodic table group header}} and {{Infobox periodic table group/footer}} to {{Infobox periodic table group footer}}; or better still {{Periodic table group header}}, since the templates in which they are used (e.g. {{Periodic table (chalcogens)}}) are not named "Infobox..." Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What I do understand of this reply, Andy Mabbett, confirms that the /doc (and you) describe my point. Renaming story is OT. -DePiep (talk) 21:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Greek constituency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete DavidLeighEllis (talk) 04:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Template:Infobox Greek constituency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only eight transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox constituency}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox PL constituency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox PL constituency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only three transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox constituency}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:01, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Thailand electoral district

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Thailand electoral district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox constituency}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:01, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Sri Lankan Provincial Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sri Lankan Provincial Council (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox legislature}} or {{Infobox legislative session}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to Template:Infobox legislative session.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 12:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox United Kingdom Parliament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox United Kingdom Parliament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only a single transclusion. Redundant to {{Infobox legislature}} or {{Infobox legislative session}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to Template:Infobox legislative session.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Romanian legislature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Romanian legislature (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox legislature}} or {{Infobox legislative session}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this extremely unwieldy template, as redundant to Template:Infobox legislative session.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Montanabw^(talk) 02:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Romanian minister office

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Romanian minister office (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 18 transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox official post}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Montanabw^(talk) 02:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox CF rank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 9 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Hall of Fame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Hall of Fame (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only nine transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox museum}} (or possibly, in some cases, {{Infobox organisation}}). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant, IB museum is definitely used for halls of fame.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:I gotta disagree on this one; Halls of Fame are rather unique critters and there are a lot of them. Usually include a museum, but not exclusively a museum. Montanabw^(talk) 02:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There are only nine uses of the template; that is not " a lot". As noted above, other HoFs use the museum infobox. Can you give an example of a HoF which is not a museum, or which could not use that template? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
keep Frietjes (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a vote. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ISBNlink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISBNlink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

per ISBN-10 and ISBN-13, this is little used and redundant. Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to simply [[Special:Booksources/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]] (replacing {{{1}}} with the ISBN, and {{{2}}} with the link text, of course) or even simply "ISBN" followed by the ISBN, if no link text is needed. —PC-XT+ 01:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Christchurch East by-election, 2013

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 9 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.