Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 June 23

< June 22	June 24 >

June 23

Template:Created with Adobe Illustrator/en

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Created with Adobe Illustrator/en (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused subtemplate. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the only template subpages should be /doc /sandbox /testcases. Everything else is suspect. --Netoholic @ 06:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Created with Blender

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Created with Blender (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Created with Numbers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, creates a link to a missing category, and redundant to {{createdwith}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. --Netoholic @ 06:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:World Communion of Reformed Churches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:World Communion of Reformed Churches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only used in one article, that already contains most of the information of this template The Banner talk 10:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; the template was completed yesterday, and that's the reason it hasn't been used in the articles it refers to. Lokförare (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to the history the template was created on 30 May 2013. The Banner talk 22:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you're right, but until 22 June 2014‎ the template listed only the members in Africa. Since it hasn't been complete, it's natural that it hasn't been used either. Lokförare (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Seems to replicate the functions of categories and lists. --Netoholic @ 06:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion lists four reasons to delete the templates, replication of functions of categories and lists is not one of them. Actually, there are a lot of similar templates here which could be compared to categories (Template:Countries of North America, Template:Lutheran World Federation Churches, Template:Commercial fish topics etc.), and they're not being discussed for deletion, Lokförare (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Template namespace#Guidelines mentions "Templates should not be used to create lists of links to other articles when a category or a See also list can perform the same function" -- Netoholic @ 02:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete, after merging with the article, or splitting into a separate list article. as pointed out by Netoholic, this would be better covered by a category. Frietjes (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Templates in Category:Consonant templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 July 11 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Countries in the Eurovision Dance Contest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirected Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Countries in the Eurovision Dance Contest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is obsolete and has been replaced with an improved version Template:Eurovision Dance Contest. Wes Mᴥuse 00:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - seems like a standard merge, and redirect prevents re-creation while linking back to old edit history. -- Netoholic @ 06:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I think I had one of those memory lapses and forgotten about redirects. I'll do that, and withdraw this deletion nomination. Wes Mᴥuse 08:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

redirect Frietjes (talk) 23:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.