Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 31
< January 30 | February 1 > |
---|
January 31
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This template looks pretty similar to Template:Infobox athletics event, which also has a section for Olympic records. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I'm creating a new series of articles that will use this template (see 100 metres at the Olympics). It will be easily usable for non-athletics event with minor tweaks, but I'm starting on the athletics ones first. SFB 18:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Sillyfolkboy's intentions to utilize it in new articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Can't you tweak the existing Template:Infobox athletics event instead of creating a new one?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Given that those infoboxes only share two parameters (which have different required presentations), that doesn't seem like a good merge. As I said above, this could easily serve as an Olympic infobox for any event overview (for example, 100 metres butterfly at the Olympics). However, the fact that 100 metres butterfly wasn't even a redirect, let alone an article, shows that other sports aren't yet ready for this level of coverage. SFB 15:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Can't you tweak the existing Template:Infobox athletics event instead of creating a new one?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
template used in just one article, so can be substituted there and theen deleted. The Banner talk 12:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- keep, standard practice is to separate these very complicated route templates from the main article. Frietjes (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Unless the template is used in only one article... The Banner talk 11:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Template:AdSlogan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Fails WP:NENAN. Doesn't seems like slogans list need template jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 05:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- delete the list articles are sufficient. --NSH002 (talk) 20:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 21:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The TranSouth Athletic Conference folded after the 2013 season. This template has two redirects that should be deleted along with it. Dafoeberezin3494 (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Precedence for deleting templates like this here, here, here, here, here, and here. Dafoeberezin3494 (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete Unused. NSH002 (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
There's no reason not to use Template:Infobox television episode instead of this newly created fork template. The only article on which it is used has been nominated for deletion. eh bien mon prince (talk) 05:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Replace and delete per nom, overspecific specialization -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 05:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.