Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 11

< January 10	January 12 >

January 11

Taxonomy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Result. Reasoning. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taxonomy/Euchambersiinae (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Taxonomy/Moschorhininae (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Taxonomy/Annatherapsinae (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated. Debresser (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete. The above three templates are now all unused. --NSH002 (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:First Fitna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Result. Reasoning. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:First Fitna (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This isn't a template. Furius (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: almost-perfect duplicate of article First Fitna. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 19:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Characters in A Midsummer Night's Dream

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Characters in A Midsummer Night's Dream (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{A Midsummer Night's Dream}}. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Bertaut (talk) 01:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete redundant to main template. Dwanyewest (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Characters in Romeo and Juliet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Characters in Romeo and Juliet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Romeo and Juliet}}. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Bertaut (talk) 01:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete redundant to main template. Dwanyewest (talk) 05:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Test templates created by Amit6 (talk · contribs) in a userspace (C (talk · contribs)) not his/her own

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Special:PrefixIndex/User:C/

This is a very large number of test templates located at Special:PrefixIndex/User:C/ created by one user, Amit6 (talk · contribs), in an inactive user's space, C (talk · contribs), so it is in the wrong userspace, and is misleading in who owns these. The creator has agreed to deletion at the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:User_pages -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made a request at WP:Administrators' noticeboard#Speedy deletion of 1,397 pages. Johnuniq (talk) 04:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done See WP:Administrators' noticeboard#Speedy deletion of 1,397 pages Makyen (talk) 05:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Educor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Educor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed for navigation. None of the executives listed are wikilinked, and in any case they constitute information that should go into the infobox on the comapny's page, not a navbox. The only items that +are+ linked are the colleges, which are best dealt with by a list in the main article, and possibly a new category. NSH002 (talk) 12:45, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think the navigation box makes it easier for users to find information on the colleges owned by Educor. We could theoretically use a list on Educor's page, but that would involve the user being interested enough to go to the page, rather than just use the template at the bottom to navigate. Additionally, most educational institutions of repute have their own navigation boxes, but the colleges owned by Educor don't have enough information available to warrant making an infobox for each of those colleges, so it's easier to just use the Educor infobox until the colleges have enough information about them. Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 11:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment I have removed the info on the executives that, in part, belongs in the infobox on Educor's page. You should add it there, updated if necessary. Note also that the Educor page is using the wrong infobox - it should probably be {{Infobox company}}. That just leaves the colleges; I leave it to others to judge whether that is sufficient to keep this navbox. --NSH002 (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment I think this change is a good compromise. There is no need to clutter up the template with information that doesn't exist but it is important to be able to navigate among the colleges. :) Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.