Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 9

< February 8	February 10 >

February 9

Template:B490

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:B490 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation template listing locations on a minor, non-notable road (whose article, the only page this template is used on, ~~is at AfD and has not a single keep !vote~~was redirected to a list at AfD). The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for being too small and non-notable. —PC-XT+ 02:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as transport cruft.--Charles (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable crap. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Article Incubator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. Feel free to revise it or rewrite it or mark it as historical, if appropriate. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article Incubator (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article Incubator has been closed down per Wikipedia:Article Incubator/RfC to close down Incubator Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite per IP below, ~~delete, or mark historical~~ per RfC consensus (~~Unless we want to mark it historical for some reason~~) —PC-XT+ 10:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC) 10:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mark historical or rewrite to "This has been moved into DraftSpace for improvement..." to mark pages moved out of mainspace and into draftspace for the same reasons that we used to incubate them. -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 07:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I updated my !vote. —PC-XT+ 07:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close Incubation is current policy and the WP:AI is subsumed at WP:Drafts. This template is covered by the recent consensus reached at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/RfC to close down Incubator. The RfC included the statements that the incubator's "pages will be marked historical" and "any editors who are currently interested in working with the Incubator can carry out the same functions using the Draft namespace". The loss of this template would severely disable the ability of interested editors, other than admins, to understand the existing incubation process. For example Category:Articles in the Article Incubator nominated for deletion and Category:Articles in the Article Incubator nominated for assessment are best understood by looking at the code in this template. In addition, the code should remain visible for the use of new templates created for WP:Drafts. Unscintillating (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. The template is needed. !vote updated. —PC-XT+ 00:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.