Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 16
Appearance
February 16
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
A sidebar for two links? Doesn't seem necessary. Gloss • talk 06:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William 15:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete yea, only 2 links it seems pointless. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete Not used, replaced by a table on 40th Canadian Parliament#Party standings. 117Avenue (talk) 06:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not sure why this wasn't put on the Parliament page in the first place. --—Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 08:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.