Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 12
December 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was fix. There is consensus that this template needs to be fixed, either by splitting up per county, or by adding a parameter to switch per county. There is no indication either choice will be contentious, and can be performed per editors discretion. If the former is chosen/preferred/performed, this template can be speedily deleted. If the latter is chosen, it is kept. They who boldly perform the task are free to decide. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
scope is too broad. Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Suggestion: add a non-optional "county" parameter to make only 1 county visible; otherwise, break up the template and make separate templates for each county. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Split (or add parameter for the same effect) per P199. The villages are listed in district templates, which are placed on the village articles. Districts of Albania apparently became defunct in 2000, replaced by counties. We probably need to split this into a template for each county, as P199 says, to replace the district templates in village articles. We have {{Counties of Albania}} to simply list the counties, already. —PC-XT+ 21:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 21:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Army of Two (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
With only 3 titles, I don't think this requires it's own template - not necessary. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, textbook WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Unnecessary, defunct, not informative. Sawol (talk) 07:32, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete We don't need roster templates from the Korea Baseball Futures League. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.