Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 15

< October 14	October 16 >

October 15

Template:GovtOfMaharashtra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GovtOfMaharashtra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, Government of Maharashtra already uses an infobox. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Louisville Memorial Auditorium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Louisville Memorial Auditorium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subst & Delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
see Louisville Memorial Auditorium. 174.56.57.138 (talk) 03:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cour de Cassation (France)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cour de Cassation (France) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previously used on Sociétié Plon et autres v. Pierre Hugo et autres, where it was replaced with an instance of {{Infobox court case}}. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 18:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - tucoxn\^talk 09:57, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:13th National Assembly of Pakistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge and delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:13th National Assembly of Pakistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use, should be merged with History of the National Assembly of Pakistan and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ang Tanging Ina (film series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ang Tanging Ina (film series) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
move to article space. seems like this does not duplicate any existing article. Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Daquan Marshburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Daquan Marshburn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, could find no evidence that this person is notable. Frietjes (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Subtitle/Taxon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subtitle/Taxon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template seems to achieve something undesirable, and is, I believe, contrary to the template namespace guideline. It creates a "subtitle", apparently for use in taxonomic articles. There is no history of using such subtitles on en.wiki, and I not aware of any discussion mandating their introduction. The guideline states that "[t]emplates should not do the work of article content in the main article namespace", and I believe this template contravenes that. Any alternative names, scientific or vernacular, can and should be included in the lead, and not in a subtitle. Stemonitis (talk) 19:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep large number of transclusions indicate this has some utility and should be kept. LT910001 (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I wouldn't call 44 a "large number"; also note that they were all added fairly recently, and by a very small number of editors (possibly only one). --Stemonitis (talk) 07:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it gives the article a strange look. @user:LT910001, please take a look at one of the article which use it, e.g. Cypraea_tigris; the first line "Cypraea tigris • Tiger cowry" and the <hr> (long line) is from the template – it does nothing else. Christian75 (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, unless someone modifies MediaWiki:Common.js to make this work. the idea is to achieve what you see in fr:Cypraea tigris, but to make that work you need something in the javascript to merge the headings (see the 'sousTitreH1' in fr:MediaWiki:Common.js). without that extra code, this will never work properly. Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete I have no idea why we use this. It's redundant, has a confusing horizontal line, is a very major change to the appearance of articles, has a different, odd font, and breaks the convention of the format of the rest of the article. All 91 transclutions should be removed and the template deleted. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete I agree with Anna on this. I really don't like the way this looks; it is very disruptive to the design of the page, plus it is redundant because the idea has always been that we list alternate scientific names and common names within the first sentence. Invertzoo (talk) 20:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Red Faction Saints Row

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Red Faction Saints Row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template, with Template: Saints Row series and Template: Red Faction. Editing tests maybe? Redundant anyway. Soetermans. T / C 13:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EDL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, but I will rename it as suggested. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EDL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only lists six articles; made redundant by Category:English Defence League — Richard BB 10:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it is helpful for navigation. I'm not the best at templates, but is there a relevant set of policies that apply to templates like this? Hobit (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep, unless there is another reason for deleting it; connecting 7 articles is a perfectly good use of a navbox. we should rename it though to Template:English Defence League. Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.