Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 10
March 10
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Uhuru Kenyatta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
should be moved onto article since single use WOSlinker (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support deletion. Ali Fazal (talk) 23:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Info already at Uhuru Kenyatta article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Wrong venue Dianna (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This is a new user box that expresses a strong opinion about the political situation in the Middle East. Please also see File:IsraeliRevoulotion.png, a flag he has created that combines the Syrian flag with a set of Stars of David. I think the user box and the flag are outside the scope of material that is acceptable content for user pages, and have nominated both for deletion to get wider input. Dianna (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: it's inflammatory. --Stfg (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Wrong venue, see Wikipedia:TFD#What not to propose for discussion here. 174.56.57.138 (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, I did not know that, and have re-posted at the correct venue. -- Dianna (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
only links three articles (one link is redirect) that are already well connected. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.