Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 17

< July 16	July 18 >

July 17

Template:Footer Movies Harish Shankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Movies Harish Shankar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Normal threshold for valid navigation templates is five relevant links. The Banner talk 22:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since the template was nominated for deletion, two more links have been added, so it now has five links. DH85868993 (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I see 4 films and the normally not counted backlink to the subject. Not 5 relevant links. The Banner talk 00:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep, has enough links. Frietjes (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a template for "films directed by..." is highly helpful for navigation, I don't see a great difference if it has four or five links. WP:NENAN is just an essay. Cavarrone 20:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chilean Cuarta División

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. For the sake of posterity, only four clubs of 19 were linked at the time of deletion, and half of those left are at AfD. Also, how do you have a league with 19 clubs? --BDD (talk) 18:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chilean Cuarta División (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Collection of mostly non-notable clubs. The Cuarta División de Chile is the fifth division of football. It is an amateur division, several flights under the professional division and fails WP:GNG. A template for its clubs is not noteworthy. MicroX (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Most clubs have an article, so I don't think they are non-notable. The Banner talk 11:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most of those clubs are up for deletion. --MicroX (talk) 21:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete speedy – The lowest Chilean football division, non-professional. Banhtrung1 (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a navbox of non-notable clubs? Serves no purpose as most will remain redlinks for the forseeable future. Giant Snowman 09:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Joey Badass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joey Badass (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Links only four articles, ~~one at prod~~. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Banhtrung1 (talk) 06:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Planet Asia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Planet Asia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Only one unique album; the rest are already on the navboxes for DJ Muggs and Cali Agents. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NENAN. STATic message me! 17:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.--Zoupan 04:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a sufficient number of links, the point that some links are also included in other templates is not relevant here. WP:NENAN is just an essay written by the same nominator, nominating for deletion a template on the sole basis of an essay written by himself is pretty ridicolous. Cavarrone 08:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep, helpful alternative navigation that is not a proper subset of any other template. Frietjes (talk) 17:31, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - links related, notable articles - serves a purpose, no reason to delete. Giant Snowman 18:26, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep − Planet Asia is a notable rapper. Internet have too many images mentioned him. He is known commonly. Banhtrung1 (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.