Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 January 20

< January 19	January 21 >

January 20

Template:Bonkers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bonkers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox linking to three articles, which mostly link to each other already.. Trivialist (talk) 18:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete. Frietjes (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Robert Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Robert Taylor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary navbox for an animator who doesn't even have an article; the box contains two links (Goof Troop and Bonkers (TV series) and one redlink (Robert Taylor (animator)). Trivialist (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NENAN and lacking a parent article. This is also a variant of performer by performance. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TPH. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete. Frietjes (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Lists of county cricketers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lists of county cricketers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superfluous template listing a list of players that would fit better in a county-wise template. Now creating massive problems with List of Hampshire CCC players and it is likely that more trouble is looming with the lists of county players (almost unlimited in definition) of other counties. The Banner talk 14:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete On reflection, this is an inelegant and rushed solution to a problem that may not have existed. As suggested, an addition to an already existing template may be better. Whatever it is, I shall endeavour to take some more time to work it out, rather than muddle on! Harrias ^talk 16:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes, not required. The lists of some counties are so vast and with there being multiple formats, we end up having to have seperate lists, such as those mentioned at List of Hampshire CCC players. This template isn't a solution. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 15:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Zia Khan 01:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox American Dad! episode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox American Dad! episode (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template used for American Dad! episodes should be merged or deleted, as there are only two unique sections, the newspaper headline and disguise, which serve as non-notable, fancruft, trivia, and, if necessary, its coding could easily be placed at infobox television episode, which two new parameters with a personal name, but I am not so sure about that, though. TBr and ley ^{(what's up)} 05:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Some series do get specific parameters for the box, such as The Simpsons episodes having a field for the couch gag, but I don't think this show has the cultural impact to have its own noteworthy gag. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete. Frietjes (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.