Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 December 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 2 December 4 >

December 3[edit]

Template:General G. O. Squier class propulsion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2013 December 16 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:General G. O. Squier class propulsion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MOSIndex[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MOSIndex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Talk header now provides search ability. Magioladitis (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New message[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New message (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I bet this is useless now that we have New section option on the tab. The template was created in 2008 long before the new Wikipedia appearance. Magioladitis (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep good for use on pages where people repeatedly toppost, also readily readable, and people use it on their user talk pages, so, if they feel like making it stand out, why not? More visible than __NEWSECTIONLINK__ tab. -- 70.50.148.105 (talk) 03:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
{{talk header}} reads "Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.". -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Don't go by current transclusion count; this is the sort of template that doesn't necessary remain on a talk page. I've seen this template used off and on for years on a variety of articles. 67.100.127.200 (talk) 08:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why waste time adding/removing this template, when the overall interface could accommodate such a notice (if there were to be consensus for such a proposal)? -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 08:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could an advisory message be displayed for all pages when editing? Perhaps an edit notice, or other feature similar to those already linked to within Template:MediaWiki messages and Template:CSS and JS MediaWiki messages would cover it. Alternatively, perhaps an approporiate feature could be proposed at bugzilla (I did a quick search and didn't find anything obviously related but may have missed something). -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as redundant to other templates and features. I see little evidence that this is more useful than the alternatives. Only one regular talk page and one project page uses this -- the rest are on user talk pages, mostly of users who aren't active, and not even that many of those. --RL0919 (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Members of the House of Commons[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Members of the House of Commons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Marked as "work in progress" for more than 2 years Magioladitis (talk) 23:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now used, besides you can contirbute to it, if you think it needs more work. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 22:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This template could potentially be useful, but at present it's not: the Conservative MPs stop at the letter E, Labour and Lib Dems are lists of Yes, Minister episodes rather than MPs at all, and other parties and independents are missing entirely. Regardless of whether it's to be deleted, it really shouldn't be used in articles while it remains incomplete. Alkari (?), 8 December 2013, 23:05 UTC
The Liberal Democrats have now been added. I'm working on the rest (unless someone else gets to it first), but I make no promises as to when this will be done. Alkari (?), 9 December 2013, 01:10 UTC
It may need some formatting or small changes, but I think it's finished enough to use, now. —PC-XT+ 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New discussion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New discussion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I bet this is useless now that we have New section option on the tab. The template was created in 2008 long before the new Wikipedia appearance. I checked and the banner looks useless in all cases I went through. Magioladitis (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep good for use on pages where people repeatedly toppost, also readily readable, and projects use it on their talk pages, so, if they feel like making it stand out, why not? Much more visible than __NEWSECTIONLINK__ tab. It's been used on high-traffic article talk pages in the past, so it seems, people incorrectly post new threads on those pages (probably topposting) when they were very active. -- 70.50.148.105 (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep used on pages for new editors to help top posting mistakes. -- Moxy (talk) 23:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unless all the current transclusions (there seem to be around 300 of them) can be sensibly dealt with. The template is redundant to {{talk header}}. But it can't really be redirected there, in case that template's already in use elsewhere on the page. -- Trevj (talk • contribs) 12:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it can be replaced by {{Talk header}}. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FS-talk[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FS-talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 1 transclusion in an archive. I suggest that we subst and delee. Magioladitis (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FormerFA2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FormerFA2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Magioladitis (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bounty expired[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bounty expired (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Part of an incactove project. Only 4 transclusions. Magioladitis (talk) 23:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Microsoft[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2013 December 16 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Microsoft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Toronto-Dominion Bank[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toronto-Dominion Bank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I've cleaned this one up a bit, including removal of all the external links, but the content of the navbox really should be either in an infobox, or in a "See also" section, or in a list article. In any case, most of the data are badly out of date. NSH002 (talk) 10:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DentPortalTalk[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DentPortalTalk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Wikiproject is inactive and there is not related portal. Magioladitis (talk) 09:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PriceBox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PriceBox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Character template for another wiki, copied from here. The other wiki is CC-licensed and an attribution is given, so it isn't a copyright violation, but the template serves no function on Wikipedia and should be deleted. RL0919 (talk) 04:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Current-1.0COTF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current-1.0COTF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Part of an inactive project Magioladitis (talk) 02:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Joe 90 (TV Series)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joe 90 (TV Series) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All of the episode articles have been redirected to the list article for notability and the remaining articles are all linked through the show's article and the list article. No longer serves any navigational purpose. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 14:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NomACOTM[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NomACOTM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Part of an inactive project, unused and... huge. Magioladitis (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the "huge" part. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nom-1.0COTF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nom-1.0COTF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Part of an inactive project Magioladitis (talk) 00:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Medheader[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medheader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Magioladitis (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I think if you do some slight editing, this can be used on medical articles where too many solicitations for advice occur, to emphasize what people should not be using the talk page for. It's already orange. -- 70.50.148.105 (talk) 04:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I participate in the development of health articles. I cannot imagine any place in which this template could be used in which it would be more useful than not having any template at all. Perhaps this template was originally created with the intention of eventually having it link to relevant policies, but I can think of no way to make it useful in that way or any other way. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Close Relationships project[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Close Relationships project (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since 2008 Magioladitis (talk) 00:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_December_3&oldid=1086089235"